【王興國】論牟宗三一包養app哲學中的易學研討

Keywords: Mou Zongsan/Free logic starting point/Rules starting point/numberIngredientsMustory logic method discussion/actual knowledge discussion/actual value discussion/MU Zong-san/study of logic/study of I Ching learnIngredients price pttning/realism/axioloPurchase price pttgy

Title notes:This article is a part of the author’s doctoral paper “From logical thinking to philosophical structure – The three philosophical thinking of Mou Zong’s path to the thinking of the three philosophical thinking”.

Mou Zongsan’s Yi Xue Study is an important manifestation of his female work “Research on the Elementary and Moral Philosophy of China from the Zhou Yi” (when reprinted, it was renamed “The Natural Philosophy of the Zhou Yi and the Verses of Morality”, which is briefly called “The Yi Xue Study”). It constitutes an indispensable or missing part of Mou Zongsan’s philosophical thinking, and occupies a main position of invisibility and has an unrecognizable value in the history of the Chinese Yi and philosophical history. As we all know, in the actual evolution of Mou Zongsan’s philosophical thinking, he moved from the discussion of Yixue to the logical research, which naturally gave him an impression on the appearance. It seems that Mou’s discussion from Yixue is a “turning” or a turnaround. [1] However, whether Mou Zongsanzhe himself had a protecting website or treating it as an independent and complete system from the perspective of a system or system. The starting point of the evolution of Mou Zongsanzhe’s system lies in his criticism of modern logical thinking and mathematical thinking. This led to the formation of Mou’s logical philosophy and mathematical philosophy, which truly formed the beginning of the logical development of the three philosophical thinking system of Mou Zong. (Note: Shen Qingsong-cheung believes that Mou Zongsan’s sage “is important starting from knowledge criticism.” The “knowledge” referred to by Shen Shi may include logic and mathematics. Although it can be explained, it is inconsistent with Mou’s understanding of knowledge. Because Mou Zongsan’s “knowledge” is said by Mou Zongsan. Important refers to scientific knowledge. He regards logic and mathematics as the basic conditions of scientific knowledge. What Mou criticized is not about knowing himself, but about the theoretical basis for constructing knowledge. )[2] From this meaning, Mou Zongsan’s Yixue Research is not the starting point of his philosophical thinking system. Therefore, this article’s statement on Mou Zongsan Yixue is based on the answer to the following two questions: 1. The relationship between Mou’s Yixue and Mou’s philosophical thinking system and the development of Mou’s philosophical thinking system; 2. The relationship between Mou’s Yixue and his logical research is related to point 1. Below, these two questions are combined to conduct a simple assessment of Mou’s Easy Learning.

1. The starting point of the front logic and its symbolic meanings

The study on Easy Learning is one of the sources of Mou Zong’s three philosophical thinking. However, from the content and purpose of the study of Mou Yixue, what kind of relationship and meaning does it form for the development path of Mou’s philosophical thinking? As we all know, the result of Mou’s study of Yixue is the book “Yizhe”, which was his first philosophical work of independent thinking and writing. When he wrote this book, he wrote this bookHe is only twenty-four years old, and he is still a major student who has not yet graduated. It should be admitted that it is a very great thing for a twenty-four-year-old student to write such a book of hundreds of thousands of words, regardless of any meaning. However, it is often difficult to avoid erection and even misunderstandings. Mou himself also believed that this book “can only be regarded as an immature work of young people”, but his “starting from the beginning of thinking”, or “starting from the beginning of life, 口官网口官网口官网口官网彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩� [3] (Reprinting Zhiyan) Mou regards this “starting life” as part of his first stage of his ideological development, namely the “direct understanding”. [4][5] (Chapter 3) It can be seen that the study of Yi in the late period of Mou’s school is independent of the development of his later philosophical thinking, and has the meaning of being unnecessarily ignored. However, from Mou’s entire philosophical thinking system and progressive thinking, although his Yixue research or female work is the beginning of his life or the beginning of his thinking, it does not constitute the logical starting point of his philosophy, or the way to think, do not say that Mou’s Yixue research or the book “YiZe” is just the natural starting point of his philosophy, or the leading logical starting point of his philosophy.

The natural starting point of the development of philosophy, or the previous logic starting point and logic starting point, is completely different. – Even if it cannot be eliminated, the two can be unified in a certain philosophy. Unfortunately, this kind of unity does not exist for Mou Zong’s three philosophical studies. The natural starting point of philosophy is a self-developed and occasionally original starting point in the chaos of philosophy. It cannot define the purpose and thinking of philosophy, and it cannot be able to always penetrate the process of philosophy’s development; the logical starting point of philosophy is not the protagonist: Song Wei, Chen Jubai┃Supporting role: Xue Hua┃Others: In essence, it is the self-thinking and thinking of philosophy in logicSweetheart GardenThe development must require and existential development points or support points. It stipulates and defines the purpose and thinking of the development standards of philosophy. Without it, a philosophical system cannot be developed and organized. In fact, a philosophical system without a logical starting point or logical point cannot be imagined. Therefore, any philosophical system is based on a certain logical starting point or logical point. The starting point or focus of philosophy’s logic lies in the certain direction of the development of philosophy itself, and it can even be at the end of philosophy’s development. This depends on its own inherent specification. However, the rules of the starting point or the stake in philosophy are unshakable. It can be a hypothesis, a hypothesis or view, a empirical fact, a proposition of a subject, or a promise of the intrinsic theory, etc. Unsuccessful denial, in a philosophical system, the starting point and the sky of logicHowever, the starting points can be overlapping or unified. But there is neither a certainty nor a generality between this overlap or unity. Therefore, whether the logical starting point of a philosophy and the natural starting point can overlap or be unified is not important for this philosophy. Judging from the three philosoph